Farm Subsidy information
Santa Clara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Clara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 402
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $38,274,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mark Tamura | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $34,693 |
142 | Da Xiong Tan | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $34,495 |
143 | Shun Heung Kwong | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $34,342 |
144 | Li Hong Liang | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $32,931 |
145 | Huan Lun Guan | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $32,924 |
146 | Mariani Orchards Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $32,558 |
147 | Tian Cai Kuang | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $31,784 |
148 | Perry Orchards Inc | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $30,422 |
149 | Ralph Santos Jr | Gilroy, CA 95021 | $30,313 |
150 | Silvia Atayde | Salinas, CA 93912 | $28,822 |
151 | Zhao Wang Zhen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $28,773 |
152 | Terrill Wolfe | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $28,579 |
153 | Mr Guohua Xu | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $27,723 |
154 | Manuel Furtado | Gilroy, CA 95021 | $26,571 |
155 | Fisher Creek Land & Cattle LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $26,331 |
156 | Erica Lynn Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $24,496 |
157 | Edwin A. Tognetti | Gilroy, CA 95021 | $24,103 |
158 | Keith Lo | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $23,154 |
159 | Sik Kwan Kwong | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $23,111 |
160 | Venh Tang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $23,072 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”