Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Clara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 144
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $7,035,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $74,250 |
22 | Battaglia Ranch | San Martin, CA 95046 | $73,640 |
23 | Xay Duc Hoang | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $71,492 |
24 | Spade & Plow Organics LLC | San Martin, CA 95046 | $71,007 |
25 | Great Farm Inc. | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $66,540 |
26 | Rc Bar Ranch LLC | San Jose, CA 95135 | $63,415 |
27 | Daniel D Long | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $63,067 |
28 | Andy's Orchard LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $60,874 |
29 | Anthony Botelho | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $59,706 |
30 | Helen Hue Loi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $57,652 |
31 | Greenfield Nursery Corp. | San Martin, CA 95046 | $54,091 |
32 | West Coast Farms LLC | Woodbridge, CA 95258 | $46,096 |
33 | Phuong Hoong | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $44,782 |
34 | A & M Farm, Inc. | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $44,734 |
35 | Bob Kuang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $43,353 |
36 | Zhou Ping Cai | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $41,890 |
37 | Al Mangini | San Jose, CA 95124 | $41,250 |
38 | Daihua Cai | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $36,652 |
39 | Borello Farms Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $36,215 |
40 | Anthan He | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $34,098 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”