Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Clara County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 39 of 39
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $2,639,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Borugi LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $11,653 |
| 22 | Borello Farms Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $11,362 |
| 23 | Jonathan Nunez Esquivel | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $10,938 |
| 24 | Mariani Orchards Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $9,918 |
| 25 | Fernando Rocha | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $9,873 |
| 26 | Wen P Cheng | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $8,765 |
| 27 | Xanadu Orchards LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $8,567 |
| 28 | Fellom Ranch Vineyards | Cupertino, CA 95014 | $8,264 |
| 29 | Israel Martinez Perez | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $6,644 |
| 30 | Jim Aira | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $6,461 |
| 31 | Ravizza Ranch LLC | San Jose, CA 95125 | $4,658 |
| 32 | Shun Y Kuang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $3,078 |
| 33 | Ledeit Bros Family Properties | San Jose, CA 95173 | $3,025 |
| 34 | Pierre O Paquelier | San Jose, CA 95120 | $2,860 |
| 35 | Kathy Qiu | Dublin, CA 94568 | $2,721 |
| 36 | Kyle Wolfe | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $2,420 |
| 37 | Van Dyke Organics Inc | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,619 |
| 38 | Gregg Winovich | Campbell, CA 95008 | $715 |
| 39 | Michael William Denardo Coffelt | Hollister, CA 95023 | $550 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
