Farm Subsidy information
Santa Clara County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Clara County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 83
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $5,563,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tian Kai Kuang | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $14,746 |
42 | Olivera Egg Ranch LLC | San Jose, CA 95132 | $13,119 |
43 | Andrew Mariani | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $12,478 |
44 | Ledeit Bros Family Properties | San Jose, CA 95173 | $12,303 |
45 | Christopher Borello | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $11,846 |
46 | Borugi LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $11,653 |
47 | Borello Farms Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $11,362 |
48 | Jonathan Nunez Esquivel | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $10,938 |
49 | Mariani Orchards Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $9,918 |
50 | Fernando Rocha | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $9,873 |
51 | James Prewett | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $9,141 |
52 | Wen P Cheng | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $8,765 |
53 | Xanadu Orchards LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $8,567 |
54 | Fellom Ranch Vineyards | Cupertino, CA 95014 | $8,264 |
55 | N3 Cattle Company LLC | Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 | $8,006 |
56 | Kyle Wolfe | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $7,005 |
57 | Russell Sanders | Livermore, CA 94550 | $6,689 |
58 | Israel Martinez Perez | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $6,644 |
59 | Joseph Daniel Torres | San Jose, CA 95152 | $5,788 |
60 | Marxmiller Fishing, LLC | Cupertino, CA 95014 | $4,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”