Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Cruz County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 85
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Cruz County, California totaled $9,526,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sunbright Growers LLC | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $165,017 |
22 | River Valley Farms LLC | Aromas, CA 95004 | $156,250 |
23 | Shinta Kawahara Company Inc | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $148,489 |
24 | Maria F Derocha | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $147,392 |
25 | M Rodoni & Co Gp | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $144,625 |
26 | Jesus Alberto Urias Dba Urias Far | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $138,384 |
27 | Af Farms LLC | Freedom, CA 95019 | $135,001 |
28 | Glaum Egg Ranch Lp | Aptos, CA 95003 | $122,378 |
29 | Amparo Ramirez | Salinas, CA 93906 | $122,203 |
30 | Ruben O. Bermudez Dba Bermudez Fa | Castroville, CA 95012 | $122,182 |
31 | Ramon Suarez | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $115,010 |
32 | Fenellas Berries LLC | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $113,103 |
33 | Melgoza Bejar Farms General Partnership | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $110,891 |
34 | Luis Ortiz | Freedom, CA 95019 | $104,836 |
35 | Maria A Sanchez | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $103,541 |
36 | Third Gen Berry Farms LLC | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $100,000 |
37 | Paul K Tao | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $95,752 |
38 | Fidel Hurtado | Aromas, CA 95004 | $94,761 |
39 | Almadelia Fernandez | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $93,357 |
40 | Cirilo Anaya Bojorques | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $80,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”