Farm Subsidy information
Santa Cruz County, California
Total Subsidies in Santa Cruz County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 50
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Santa Cruz County, California totaled $3,136,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | New Horizon Farms Inc | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $37,840 |
22 | Rancho Las Palmas Gp | Davenport, CA 95017 | $24,845 |
23 | Ramon Hernandez | Freedom, CA 95019 | $18,600 |
24 | Paul K Tao | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $15,152 |
25 | Jose Rangel | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $11,980 |
26 | Eliazar Ortiz Lopez | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $10,972 |
27 | Zachary Robert Estrada | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $8,898 |
28 | Tom Hart | Boulder Creek, CA 95006 | $8,719 |
29 | Miguel Angel Melgoza-rocha Dba Miguel Angel Farms | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $8,400 |
30 | Andrea Sonnabend | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $7,015 |
31 | Everett Sparling | Hollister, CA 95023 | $6,352 |
32 | Kenneth George Miller | Scotts Valley, CA 95066 | $6,296 |
33 | Margaret Kosek | Stanford, CA 94305 | $6,275 |
34 | Dustin L Nelson | Aptos, CA 95003 | $5,741 |
35 | Harry Serafin | Hollister, CA 95023 | $5,481 |
36 | Jose Luis Ramirez | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $4,307 |
37 | Scott Bruce | Boulder Creek, CA 95006 | $3,566 |
38 | Juan Vergara | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $2,282 |
39 | Steven J Webb | Davenport, CA 95017 | $1,994 |
40 | Joshua Cameron Larson | Aptos, CA 95003 | $1,680 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”