Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Cruz County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 85

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Cruz County, California totaled $9,526,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
41Hikari Farms, LLCWatsonville, CA 95076$74,491
42Chula Vista Berries LLCWatsonville, CA 95076$68,403
43Mariani-stonebarger LLCWatsonville, CA 95076$62,048
44Ortiz Jr Farms IncFreedom, CA 95019$56,501
45Guillermo AvalosRoyal Oaks, CA 95076$52,936
46Luis U PadillaWatsonville, CA 95076$52,092
47Inocencio RenteriaFreedom, CA 95019$51,749
48Jose Estrada MedranoWatsonville, CA 95076$51,151
49Francisco Flores RodriguezWatsonville, CA 95076$49,382
50Bernabe Camacho CruzWatsonville, CA 95076$49,271
51Juan Antonio Vazquez CastellonAromas, CA 95004$49,068
52Vasquez Lopez Farms LLCWatsonville, CA 95076$48,696
53Agustin Arredondo UrbinaWatsonville, CA 95076$46,655
54Miguel Angel Melgoza-rocha Dba Miguel Angel FarmsWatsonville, CA 95076$44,710
55Antonio Rodriguez FriasAromas, CA 95004$44,547
56Efrain Meza MedranoSalinas, CA 93906$43,285
57Charles Bella & Sons Orchard GpAptos, CA 95003$43,204
58Anastacio Medrano Dba Medrano's FWatsonville, CA 95076$38,154
59New Horizon Farms IncWatsonville, CA 95076$37,840
60Mcginnis Ranch LLCRoyal Oaks, CA 95076$34,443

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag