Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Cruz County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 85
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Cruz County, California totaled $9,526,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ben Lomond Wine Company LLC | Bonny Doon, CA 95060 | $34,209 |
62 | Marsalisi Farms LLC | Corralitos, CA 95076 | $30,327 |
63 | Fogline Farm LLC | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $23,982 |
64 | Luis Silva | Salinas, CA 93905 | $23,135 |
65 | Louise Moran | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $18,953 |
66 | Ramon Hernandez | Freedom, CA 95019 | $18,600 |
67 | Rancho Las Palmas Gp | Davenport, CA 95017 | $14,019 |
68 | Hillside Berries LLC | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $12,572 |
69 | Jose Rangel | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $11,980 |
70 | Gladys Mirella Mondragon | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $10,990 |
71 | Eliazar Ortiz Lopez | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $10,972 |
72 | Andrea Sonnabend | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $8,068 |
73 | Margaret Kosek | Stanford, CA 94305 | $7,216 |
74 | Dustin L Nelson | Aptos, CA 95003 | $5,741 |
75 | Steven J Webb | Davenport, CA 95017 | $5,555 |
76 | N Bar A Ranch LLC | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $5,205 |
77 | Zachary Robert Estrada | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $4,997 |
78 | Jack Buchalter | Pescadero, CA 94060 | $3,074 |
79 | , | $2,843 | |
80 | Jose Luis Ramirez | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $2,530 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”