Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Santa Cruz County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 77
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Santa Cruz County, California totaled $1,975,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Peter M Radin | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $23,919 |
22 | Kathy C Mann | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $23,469 |
23 | Bill Lee | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $22,847 |
24 | Gizdich Ranch | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $22,782 |
25 | Eric Mckee | Santa Cruz, CA 95062 | $19,540 |
26 | Denevan Apples Dba | Santa Cruz, CA 95065 | $17,165 |
27 | Ocean Angel III LLC | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $14,296 |
28 | Godoy Orchards Dba | Freedom, CA 95019 | $14,058 |
29 | Vukasovich Sisters Farm | Spreckels, CA 93962 | $13,092 |
30 | H A Rider And Sons Gp | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $10,712 |
31 | Raymond S Quezada | San Jose, CA 95128 | $10,432 |
32 | Radin Bros | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $9,268 |
33 | John Colendich | Spreckels, CA 93962 | $9,069 |
34 | Tom Hart | Boulder Creek, CA 95006 | $8,719 |
35 | Vg Haselhofer | Freedom, CA 95019 | $8,519 |
36 | Conde Farms | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $8,362 |
37 | Khevin Rene Mellegers | Felton, CA 95018 | $8,236 |
38 | Peter A Battinich | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $7,637 |
39 | Calder Deyerle | Castroville, CA 95012 | $6,847 |
40 | Kenneth George Miller | Scotts Valley, CA 95066 | $6,296 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”