Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Santa Cruz County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 85

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Santa Cruz County, California totaled $9,526,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Creekside Farms IncWatsonville, CA 95077$500,000
2Smith Gardens IncBellingham, WA 98226$500,000
3George/diaz Rancho Alitos LLCWatsonville, CA 95077$468,276
4Chapala Berry Farms IncWatsonville, CA 95076$428,688
5Olallieberry Farms Inc - Dba Navarro FarmsWatsonville, CA 95077$419,604
6Fujii Bros GpWatsonville, CA 95076$274,378
7Miguel A Ramirez Dba Usa Berry FaCastroville, CA 95012$250,000
8Aptos Berry Farms IncWatsonville, CA 95076$250,000
9Fitz Fresh IncFreedom, CA 95019$250,000
10Reiter Berry Farms IncWatsonville, CA 95076$250,000
11Jose Luis Melgoza Zamora Dba J &Watsonville, CA 95077$250,000
12Scurich Berry Farms IncWatsonville, CA 95077$250,000
13Kitayama Bros IncWatsonville, CA 95077$250,000
14Alta Vista Farms LpWatsonville, CA 95077$250,000
15Garroutte Farms IncWatsonville, CA 95077$250,000
16Abelardo Amador GarciaFreedom, CA 95019$224,373
17Cowles Berry Farm IncFreedom, CA 95019$212,056
18Maripa Ranch LLCFreedom, CA 95019$204,091
19Salvador AnayaHollister, CA 95023$188,980
20Pacific Coast Berries LLCWatsonville, CA 95077$182,013

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag