Total Conservation Programs in Santa Cruz County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Santa Cruz County, California totaled $186,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | D & D Ranch Gp | San Jose, CA 95113 | $37,481 |
2 | Estrada Bros Gp | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $33,319 |
3 | Alto Corralitos Ranch | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $31,802 |
4 | Suncrest Nurseries Inc | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $10,500 |
5 | William J Young | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $9,952 |
6 | Robert J Locatelli | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $9,772 |
7 | Marsalisi Farms LLC | Corralitos, CA 95076 | $9,354 |
8 | High Grounds Organics Dba | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $6,095 |
9 | Golden State Bulb Growers Inc | Moss Landing, CA 95039 | $5,040 |
10 | Carl Cole | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $4,685 |
11 | John Rocha Jr | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $4,425 |
12 | Jeannie Thomas | Cupertino, CA 95014 | $3,726 |
13 | Mario Buksa | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $3,500 |
14 | Stephen Storrs | Aptos, CA 95003 | $3,398 |
15 | Frank Jimenez | Aptos, CA 95003 | $3,360 |
16 | Donald M Campbell | San Francisco, CA 94111 | $2,841 |
17 | Ralph Maragoni | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $1,551 |
18 | Leopoldo Rocha | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $1,400 |
19 | Agricultural Lands Conserv | Santa Cruz, CA 95065 | $1,273 |
20 | Terry Fieldhouse | Santa Clara, CA 95051 | $990 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>