Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Shasta County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 99
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $1,686,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bill Holland | Oroville, CA 95965 | $16,995 |
22 | Danny Oilar | Millville, CA 96062 | $16,984 |
23 | Larry L Carpenter | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $16,109 |
24 | Louise Masingale | Millville, CA 96062 | $15,350 |
25 | Richard Sabanovich | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $14,975 |
26 | G Ivar Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $14,863 |
27 | Lynn Taylor | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $14,005 |
28 | Hawes River Acres | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $13,961 |
29 | Daniel P Hagus | Anderson, CA 96007 | $12,804 |
30 | Vrismo & Stephenson | Bella Vista, CA 96008 | $12,061 |
31 | Bar Eleven Ranch | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $12,024 |
32 | Jeff Owens | Igo, CA 96047 | $11,997 |
33 | Robert S Callison | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $11,886 |
34 | Case M Blanken | Redding, CA 96001 | $10,270 |
35 | Justin Hoy | Anderson, CA 96007 | $10,030 |
36 | Rigo Lozoya | Anderson, CA 96007 | $10,024 |
37 | Martin Family 1995 Trust | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $9,786 |
38 | William Holland | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $9,498 |
39 | Lori Richards | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $9,328 |
40 | Edward Gill | Millville, CA 96062 | $9,227 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”