Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Shasta County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 52
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $1,004,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ginger Fowler | Ono, CA 96047 | $10,736 |
22 | Mike Shufelberger | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $10,302 |
23 | Austin Williams | Oak Run, CA 96069 | $10,184 |
24 | Bar Eleven Ranch | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $8,616 |
25 | G Ivar Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $8,171 |
26 | Davie Leon Landis | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $7,280 |
27 | Deborah Stevenson | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $7,280 |
28 | , | $5,790 | |
29 | Lori Richards | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $5,374 |
30 | Martin Family 1995 Trust | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $5,300 |
31 | Jack And Kathlynn Collins Revoc Trust | Riverbank, CA 95367 | $4,654 |
32 | Robert Anderson | Millville, CA 96062 | $4,611 |
33 | Frank Stone | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $4,338 |
34 | Justin Hoy | Anderson, CA 96007 | $4,149 |
35 | Kelley Ferry | Alturas, CA 96101 | $4,031 |
36 | Richard J. Mrofka | Anderson, CA 96007 | $4,008 |
37 | Grant A Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $3,961 |
38 | William David Ault | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $3,610 |
39 | Morelli Ranch LLC | Millville, CA 96062 | $3,341 |
40 | Trent Thomas | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”