Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Shasta County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 179
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $6,708,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Norene Ranches Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $22,843 |
62 | Kevin N. Young And Lana K. Young | Galt, CA 95632 | $22,372 |
63 | Heidi A. Dixon | Millville, CA 96062 | $22,371 |
64 | William O Crum | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $22,276 |
65 | Don Matheson | Anderson, CA 96007 | $21,944 |
66 | Richard Sabanovich | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $21,633 |
67 | Tal Neilsen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $21,381 |
68 | Robert Anderson | Millville, CA 96062 | $21,219 |
69 | Matt Norene | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $20,528 |
70 | Ernest Bruce | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $20,331 |
71 | William David Ault | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $19,776 |
72 | The Gary And Martha Rutherford 20 | Bella Vista, CA 96008 | $18,985 |
73 | Judith A Fields Separate Property | Oak Run, CA 96069 | $18,915 |
74 | Isidro Hernandez-nava | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $18,576 |
75 | Chad Kyle Amen | Anderson, CA 96007 | $17,685 |
76 | John Van Eperen | Redding, CA 96002 | $17,209 |
77 | Leora Hencratt | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $17,158 |
78 | Louise Masingale | Millville, CA 96062 | $16,362 |
79 | Virginia L Morelli Revocable Trus | Millville, CA 96062 | $14,993 |
80 | Kelley Ferry | Alturas, CA 96101 | $14,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”