Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Shasta County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 111
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $1,222,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mike Christenson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $1,375 |
82 | Frank Stone | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $1,320 |
83 | William M Coe | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $1,210 |
84 | Isidro Hernandez-nava | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $1,155 |
85 | J S Barnhart | Redding, CA 96001 | $1,155 |
86 | Tami Chrisman | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $1,100 |
87 | Donna Abbott | Millville, CA 96062 | $1,100 |
88 | William David Ault | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $1,045 |
89 | Dusty K. Steele | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $1,045 |
90 | Lori Newsom | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $1,045 |
91 | Marcille A Farrell | Millville, CA 96062 | $990 |
92 | Tucker Living Trust Of 1992 | Ono, CA 96047 | $963 |
93 | Richard Titus | Gerber, CA 96035 | $937 |
94 | Audie Butcher | Anderson, CA 96007 | $880 |
95 | Alan Wesley Tucker | Ono, CA 96047 | $880 |
96 | Robyn Caldwell | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $825 |
97 | Susan Hanifl | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $825 |
98 | , | $800 | |
99 | Providence International Enterprises | Redding, CA 96099 | $742 |
100 | Don Matheson | Anderson, CA 96007 | $660 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”