Total Conservation Programs in Shasta County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 108
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $1,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dean Kearl | Citrus Heights, CA 95610 | $2,378 |
82 | Bengt Anderson | Igo, CA 96047 | $2,136 |
83 | Jean A Beauchamp | Redding, CA 96001 | $2,121 |
84 | Carlos Albuquerque | Oak Run, CA 96069 | $2,085 |
85 | Denis D Corrin | Shasta, CA 96087 | $1,998 |
86 | Cindy Lohr | Shingletown, CA 96088 | $1,998 |
87 | Daniel Smith | San Jose, CA 95148 | $1,963 |
88 | Anthony G Traficante | French Gulch, CA 96033 | $1,700 |
89 | Blossom Hamusek Mcgann | Redding, CA 96002 | $1,604 |
90 | The Abbott Family Revoc Trust | Millville, CA 96062 | $1,500 |
91 | Wally Liberman | Redding, CA 96003 | $1,400 |
92 | Anne Brown | Round Mountain, CA 96084 | $1,350 |
93 | Roy Maloney | Igo, CA 96047 | $1,275 |
94 | Donvil Odle | Anderson, CA 96007 | $1,191 |
95 | Rudy Balma | Bella Vista, CA 96008 | $914 |
96 | David L Drennan | Bella Vista, CA 96008 | $765 |
97 | Huscher Family Trust | Redding, CA 96003 | $750 |
98 | Wtae Trust | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $710 |
99 | Elizabeth Hoagland Berridge | Igo, CA 96047 | $600 |
100 | Jack Hart | Burney, CA 96013 | $462 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”