Farm Subsidy information
Shasta County, California
Total Subsidies in Shasta County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 134
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $2,415,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Tucker Living Trust Of 1992 | Ono, CA 96047 | $1,336 |
102 | David D Duncan | Anderson, CA 96007 | $1,269 |
103 | Jack And Kathlynn Collins Revoc Trust | Riverbank, CA 95367 | $1,181 |
104 | Donna Abbott | Millville, CA 96062 | $1,100 |
105 | Dusty K. Steele | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $1,045 |
106 | Lori Newsom | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $1,045 |
107 | Marcille A Farrell | Millville, CA 96062 | $990 |
108 | Isidro Hernandez-nava | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $935 |
109 | Ricky A Perea Sr | Manton, CA 96059 | $867 |
110 | Amanda Spoon | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $848 |
111 | Robert Anderson | Millville, CA 96062 | $847 |
112 | Robyn Caldwell | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $825 |
113 | Thomas F Coe | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $756 |
114 | Providence International Enterprises | Redding, CA 96099 | $742 |
115 | Shawn Steele | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $733 |
116 | Patrick Edward Lanham | Anderson, CA 96007 | $730 |
117 | John Fields | Oak Run, CA 96069 | $707 |
118 | 2012 Richter Ranch Trust | Igo, CA 96047 | $660 |
119 | Jeffrey Allen Carman | Redding, CA 96001 | $640 |
120 | Daniel Carter | Igo, CA 96047 | $635 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”