Total Disaster Programs in Shasta County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 492
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $14,404,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | David Dela Cadena | Anderson, CA 96007 | $35,147 |
102 | Glenn Aldridge Revoc Trust | Shingletown, CA 96088 | $34,467 |
103 | William O Crum | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $33,396 |
104 | Carl Rounds | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $32,589 |
105 | Costello Living Trust | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $32,474 |
106 | , | $31,994 | |
107 | The Gary And Martha Rutherford 20 | Bella Vista, CA 96008 | $31,091 |
108 | Gover Ranch | Anderson, CA 96007 | $31,073 |
109 | Don Matheson | Anderson, CA 96007 | $30,835 |
110 | A & M Farms | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $29,112 |
111 | Trudy Wilson-karr | Anderson, CA 96007 | $28,648 |
112 | Tal Neilsen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $28,626 |
113 | Tyler Martinez | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $28,049 |
114 | Lee Rodger | Sacramento, CA 95818 | $28,022 |
115 | Norene Ranches Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $27,413 |
116 | Heidi A. Dixon | Millville, CA 96062 | $27,024 |
117 | Tom Martinez | Lake City, CA 96115 | $26,667 |
118 | Fluidix Inc | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $25,906 |
119 | Michael P Mcdougal | Marysville, CA 95901 | $25,462 |
120 | Jack And Kathlynn Collins Revoc T | Oak Run, CA 96069 | $25,139 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”