Farm Subsidy information
Shasta County, California
Total Subsidies in Shasta County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 692
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $27,396,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tubit Enterprises Inc | Burney, CA 96013 | $1,727,763 |
2 | Warner Enterprises Inc | Redding, CA 96003 | $1,054,347 |
3 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $1,047,779 |
4 | Sierra Pacific Industries | Anderson, CA 96007 | $913,636 |
5 | Shasta Green Inc | Burney, CA 96013 | $783,000 |
6 | Wootens Golden Queens Inc | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $748,987 |
7 | Franklin Logging Inc | Bella Vista, CA 96008 | $732,562 |
8 | K & K Rentals | Orland, CA 95963 | $622,726 |
9 | Wesley Woolery | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $555,737 |
10 | Headrick Logging | Anderson, CA 96007 | $496,858 |
11 | Hat Creek Grown LLC | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $496,684 |
12 | Holiday Ranches Inc | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $469,222 |
13 | River Ranch Lp | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $455,752 |
14 | Del Logging | Bieber, CA 96009 | $377,775 |
15 | Fruit Growers Supply Company | Hornbrook, CA 96044 | $367,537 |
16 | Denny Cattle Company LLC | Boston, MA 02113 | $292,025 |
17 | Roy A Graves | Igo, CA 96047 | $289,830 |
18 | Wolfpack Wood Recycling | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $280,658 |
19 | Bidwell Ranches Inc | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $280,642 |
20 | Corder Farms Inc | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $277,453 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>