Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Shasta County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 179
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $6,708,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hat Creek Grown LLC | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $488,130 |
2 | Holiday Ranches Inc | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $441,137 |
3 | Wesley Woolery | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $422,689 |
4 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $412,851 |
5 | Roy A Graves | Igo, CA 96047 | $319,923 |
6 | Judd Miller | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $199,929 |
7 | Bidwell Ranches Inc | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $196,333 |
8 | Shannon L And Glenda K Wooten Rvoc Trust | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $186,063 |
9 | Robert Staley | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $161,638 |
10 | Ron Anderson | Eagle Point, OR 97524 | $160,389 |
11 | Ralphs Ranches Inc | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $153,523 |
12 | Carolyn Northcutt | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $120,035 |
13 | Davie Leon Landis | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $115,161 |
14 | Bar Eleven Ranch | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $113,256 |
15 | Danny Oilar | Millville, CA 96062 | $112,281 |
16 | Timothy A Reid | Penn Valley, CA 95946 | $107,751 |
17 | Mert Bradshaw | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $104,075 |
18 | Jane Trisdale | Igo, CA 96047 | $102,214 |
19 | Grant A Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $101,829 |
20 | Russ Red Bluff Ranch LLC | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $92,846 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>