Total Disaster Programs in Shasta County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 447
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $10,166,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wootens Golden Queens Inc | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $745,399 |
2 | Holiday Ranches Inc | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $469,222 |
3 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $409,342 |
4 | Wesley Woolery | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $399,026 |
5 | Hat Creek Grown LLC | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $379,105 |
6 | Pedro Betancourt | Anderson, CA 96007 | $265,198 |
7 | Roy A Graves | Igo, CA 96047 | $239,654 |
8 | Patrick Stayer Dba Stayer's Quali | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $217,292 |
9 | Ralphs Ranches Inc | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $134,087 |
10 | Carolyn Northcutt | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $133,225 |
11 | Jane Trisdale | Igo, CA 96047 | $127,513 |
12 | Patrick H Oilar | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $123,855 |
13 | Manuel G Marcial | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $123,048 |
14 | Ernie Morfin | Anderson, CA 96007 | $122,116 |
15 | Judd Miller | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $120,609 |
16 | Davie Leon Landis | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $119,871 |
17 | Jesse Smith | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $109,351 |
18 | Shannon L And Glenda K Wooten Rvoc Trust | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $109,186 |
19 | Grant A Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $104,390 |
20 | Olinda Olive Orchards LLC | Anderson, CA 96007 | $102,692 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>