Production Flexibility Program in Shasta County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 45
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Shasta County, California totaled $499,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Greg Mayer | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $4,144 |
22 | Gover Ranch | Anderson, CA 96007 | $3,950 |
23 | Richard B Rice | Davis, CA 95616 | $3,815 |
24 | Grant A Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $3,659 |
25 | Robert Nash | Redding, CA 96003 | $2,865 |
26 | Nancy Ward | Redding, CA 96002 | $2,760 |
27 | Charles Mayo | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $2,316 |
28 | River Butte Ranch Co LLC | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $1,562 |
29 | Patrick H Oilar | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $1,462 |
30 | Susan Bryant | Redding, CA 96001 | $1,290 |
31 | Doyle Williams | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $1,182 |
32 | Raymond Christensen | San Carlos, CA 94070 | $1,143 |
33 | Paul K Van Riet | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $1,048 |
34 | Harry J Turiello Revoc Trust | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $1,008 |
35 | Soldier Mountain Farms | Costa Mesa, CA 92627 | $791 |
36 | Craig Ward | Redding, CA 96002 | $782 |
37 | Black Ranch | Burney, CA 96013 | $563 |
38 | Jean Belmonte | Redding, CA 96049 | $337 |
39 | Constance Patterson | Redding, CA 96099 | $318 |
40 | Bill G Gibson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $264 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”