Farm Subsidy information
Sierra County, California
Total Subsidies in Sierra County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 34
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sierra County, California totaled $1,221,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Erik O Roen Family Trust U/a/d August 27, 2004 | Knights Ferry, CA 95361 | $157,672 |
2 | Pamela Payen | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $89,189 |
3 | South Creek Ranch | Reno, NV 89506 | $63,054 |
4 | Peggy Corbett | Portola, CA 96122 | $59,887 |
5 | Donald Wallace | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $57,219 |
6 | Annie Rose Tipton | Sierraville, CA 96126 | $44,903 |
7 | Sunset Endeavors Inc | Sattley, CA 96124 | $41,554 |
8 | Hay Bros Sheep Co | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $39,056 |
9 | David Sklar | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $36,375 |
10 | Darwin Ceresola | Fernley, NV 89408 | $36,216 |
11 | Einen Grandi | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $34,406 |
12 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $34,357 |
13 | Jack Hanson | Susanville, CA 96130 | $22,731 |
14 | Dallice M Nuttall | Susanville, CA 96130 | $22,085 |
15 | Carol Dobbas | Beckwourth, CA 96129 | $21,582 |
16 | Genasci Family 1999 Revocable Trust | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $21,089 |
17 | Talbott Sheep Company LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $19,279 |
18 | Joe Egan | Janesville, CA 96114 | $14,662 |
19 | , | $13,788 | |
20 | Greg Ramelli | Portola, CA 96122 | $11,516 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>