Emergency Conservation Program in Siskiyou County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 134
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Siskiyou County, California totaled $1,280,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clarence R Rainey And Inez L Rainey Trust | Horse Creek, CA 96050 | $14,020 |
22 | Beverly Tobias | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $13,216 |
23 | Gareth Plank | Etna, CA 96027 | $11,930 |
24 | George Steen | Montague, CA 96064 | $11,730 |
25 | Stephen Edel | Etna, CA 96027 | $11,381 |
26 | Jenner Cattle Co Inc | Etna, CA 96027 | $11,254 |
27 | Harold B Tozier | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $11,142 |
28 | Alan May | Seiad Valley, CA 96086 | $11,029 |
29 | Stephen Townley | Montague, CA 96064 | $10,828 |
30 | Beverly Wenger | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $9,990 |
31 | Noyes Valley Cattle Co Inc | Stockton, CA 95204 | $9,951 |
32 | Larry Swenson | Mount Shasta, CA 96067 | $9,596 |
33 | Gregory D Farnam | Etna, CA 96027 | $9,315 |
34 | Ann A Robinson | Montague, CA 96064 | $9,099 |
35 | Keller Ranches LLC | Montague, CA 96064 | $8,621 |
36 | Bryan Morris Ranch Partnership | Etna, CA 96027 | $8,039 |
37 | Shirley Hammond | Mount Shasta, CA 96067 | $7,965 |
38 | Michol Jervan | Montague, CA 96064 | $7,742 |
39 | Marsha A Pitkin | Grenada, CA 96038 | $7,709 |
40 | Jenner & Sons | Etna, CA 96027 | $7,059 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”