Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Siskiyou County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 179
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Siskiyou County, California totaled $2,127,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Travis W Owens | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $8,171 |
62 | Coonrod Ranch LLC | Montague, CA 96064 | $8,083 |
63 | Richard Streed | Dorris, CA 96023 | $7,398 |
64 | Stephen Townley | Montague, CA 96064 | $7,331 |
65 | Novy Ranches | Grenada, CA 96038 | $7,219 |
66 | Amanda Sophia Rainey | Horse Creek, CA 96050 | $7,170 |
67 | Mmz LLC | Grenada, CA 96038 | $7,146 |
68 | Robert H Cook | Yreka, CA 96097 | $7,144 |
69 | David B Johnson | Etna, CA 96027 | $6,976 |
70 | Mary L Lemos | Montague, CA 96064 | $6,777 |
71 | Clarence R Rainey And Inez L Rainey Trust | Horse Creek, CA 96050 | $6,630 |
72 | Richard G Barnes | Callahan, CA 96014 | $6,521 |
73 | The H & H Land And Livestock Company, LLC C/0 Bria | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $6,488 |
74 | Joseph M Murray Jr | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $6,291 |
75 | Bryce S Brown | Etna, CA 96027 | $6,282 |
76 | Hanna Brothers LLC | Etna, CA 96027 | $6,008 |
77 | De Lavender LLC Dba Horn Ranch LLC | Hornbrook, CA 96044 | $5,809 |
78 | Scott W Dutcher | Gazelle, CA 96034 | $5,710 |
79 | Lane Murray | Montague, CA 96064 | $5,629 |
80 | Rebecca Schenone-chase | Etna, CA 96027 | $5,424 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”