Emergency Conservation Program in Siskiyou County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 134
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Siskiyou County, California totaled $1,280,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Costa & Santos Ranch | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $3,735 |
82 | Walter O Hansen Family Trust | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $3,632 |
83 | Harry C Whitehead | Prescott, AZ 86301 | $3,611 |
84 | Martin Andreas | Montague, CA 96064 | $3,552 |
85 | Arnold Anderson | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $3,459 |
86 | Donald R Howell | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $3,201 |
87 | Stephen C. Young | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $3,200 |
88 | Joseph Hurlimann | Etna, CA 96027 | $3,164 |
89 | Linda Sharp | Grenada, CA 96038 | $3,137 |
90 | James Foriska | Macdoel, CA 96058 | $3,103 |
91 | Ann Lehman | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $3,058 |
92 | Donald G Brazil | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $2,951 |
93 | David L Grassman | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $2,949 |
94 | Kenneth Fowle | Etna, CA 96027 | $2,830 |
95 | Stegall Bros Livestock | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,750 |
96 | Heide Ranch | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $2,560 |
97 | Smith Bros | Etna, CA 96027 | $2,500 |
98 | Bob Johnson | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $2,500 |
99 | Charles N Hayden | Etna, CA 96027 | $2,413 |
100 | Elizabeth E Kuck | Montague, CA 96064 | $2,367 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”