Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Siskiyou County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 305
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Siskiyou County, California totaled $18,701,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rockin M Ranch & Cattle Co, LLC | Los Olivos, CA 93441 | $35,902 |
102 | T N Cattle Co Inc | Gazelle, CA 96034 | $35,742 |
103 | Joseph David Golonka | Grenada, CA 96038 | $35,488 |
104 | Lane Murray | Montague, CA 96064 | $35,063 |
105 | Coonrod Ranch LLC | Montague, CA 96064 | $34,474 |
106 | Brooke Ashly Boyes | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $34,342 |
107 | James C Scott | Grenada, CA 96038 | $34,072 |
108 | Double Brc Ranch | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $32,659 |
109 | , | $32,325 | |
110 | Murphy's Farm Fresh Produce Dba M | Etna, CA 96027 | $32,312 |
111 | Gabriel Bridwell | Montague, CA 96064 | $31,833 |
112 | Tim Johnson | Etna, CA 96027 | $31,288 |
113 | Amanda Sophia Rainey | Horse Creek, CA 96050 | $30,933 |
114 | R Y Ranch & Hay Partnership | Yreka, CA 96097 | $30,658 |
115 | Hurlimann Brothers LLC | Etna, CA 96027 | $30,504 |
116 | Ashley R Taylor | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $30,460 |
117 | Hale Dairy Inc. | Etna, CA 96027 | $30,198 |
118 | Wayne T Criss | Macdoel, CA 96058 | $28,800 |
119 | Martin Bridwell | Montague, CA 96064 | $28,455 |
120 | Ben Beer | Grenada, CA 96038 | $28,183 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”