Farm Subsidy information
Siskiyou County, California
Total Subsidies in Siskiyou County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,195
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Siskiyou County, California totaled $141,062,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ralphs Ranches Inc | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $796,619 |
22 | Staunton Bros Partnership | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $722,648 |
23 | Bradley G Luscombe | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $712,927 |
24 | Daniel G Chin Dba Chin Farms | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $709,348 |
25 | Alfred A Herman | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $692,973 |
26 | Staunton Bros Partnership | Malin, OR 97632 | $688,967 |
27 | Tablerock Ranch | Montague, CA 96064 | $685,096 |
28 | Hayden Bros Ranch | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $680,427 |
29 | Stanley N Sears And Elizabeth A Sears | Montague, CA 96064 | $659,322 |
30 | Jenner Cattle Co Inc | Etna, CA 96027 | $654,458 |
31 | Hickey Ranches Inc | Merrill, OR 97633 | $650,997 |
32 | Chet H Porterfield | Macdoel, CA 96058 | $647,147 |
33 | Russell Peterson | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $612,736 |
34 | Ryan Walker | Montague, CA 96064 | $609,007 |
35 | Steven A Nash | Etna, CA 96027 | $602,914 |
36 | Shannon B Struble | Dorris, CA 96023 | $600,791 |
37 | Charles N Hayden | Etna, CA 96027 | $579,377 |
38 | Ray V York | Montague, CA 96064 | $577,680 |
39 | Harvey Hagedorn | Montague, CA 96064 | $575,936 |
40 | Michael Crebbin Et Al Partnership | Montague, CA 96064 | $569,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”