Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Solano County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 50
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Solano County, California totaled $916,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rod Mcgrew | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $6,532 |
22 | Jamieson Canyon Ranch | American Canyon, CA 94503 | $6,512 |
23 | Gordon R Rasmussen | Pleasanton, CA 94588 | $5,071 |
24 | Mangels Ranch Jv | Fairfield, CA 94534 | $5,043 |
25 | Spencer Wohn | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $4,830 |
26 | Donald Buhman Revocable Trust | Napa, CA 94558 | $4,431 |
27 | Willow Ranch LLC | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $4,056 |
28 | Linda Bushey | Napa, CA 94558 | $3,591 |
29 | Shady Lane Farm | Danville, CA 94526 | $3,160 |
30 | John Cronin | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $2,956 |
31 | Robin Frost | Petaluma, CA 94953 | $2,928 |
32 | William Everett | Benicia, CA 94510 | $2,866 |
33 | Neftali C Rivera | Dixon, CA 95620 | $2,841 |
34 | Bobbie Wellman | Sonora, CA 95370 | $2,338 |
35 | Barbara Cox | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $2,310 |
36 | David Frye | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $2,310 |
37 | R Emigh Livestock | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $2,303 |
38 | Garrett Rasmussen | Dixon, CA 95620 | $2,241 |
39 | William C Petersen | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $2,078 |
40 | Dee H Dermake | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,936 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”