Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 240
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Solano County, California totaled $13,261,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stanley Lester | Winters, CA 95694 | $219,632 |
22 | Sf Florin Lp | Roseville, CA 95661 | $215,232 |
23 | Hd Ranch | Dixon, CA 95620 | $193,287 |
24 | Sierra Orchards Lp | Winters, CA 95694 | $187,642 |
25 | Erik Alan Freese Dba Freese Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $177,363 |
26 | Casbar Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $172,784 |
27 | Hamilton Brothers | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $153,388 |
28 | Martinez Orchard Inc | Winters, CA 95694 | $151,705 |
29 | Hnj Farms | Davis, CA 95617 | $148,930 |
30 | Robben Orchard Company LLC | Dixon, CA 95620 | $136,367 |
31 | Pacific Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95617 | $118,967 |
32 | Lowrie Farm Co LLC | Dixon, CA 95620 | $117,703 |
33 | Tenbrink Family Trust - Eugene Te | Winters, CA 95694 | $116,047 |
34 | Sukhbir S Nagra | Vacaville, CA 95687 | $115,872 |
35 | Yah-whooo Organic Garden | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $109,291 |
36 | Knob Hill Mines Inc | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $108,432 |
37 | Martin Emigh | Dixon, CA 95620 | $103,024 |
38 | K Barsoom Ranch | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $102,579 |
39 | Linda Tenbrink | Fairfield, CA 94534 | $96,098 |
40 | Robert Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $91,506 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”