Total Commodity Programs in Solano County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 178
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Solano County, California totaled $4,577,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Matthew B Jones Jr | Dixon, CA 95620 | $56,817 |
22 | Gli-co Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $56,021 |
23 | Elizabeth R Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $51,841 |
24 | Gene Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $51,831 |
25 | Hearn Livestock General Partnership | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $51,092 |
26 | Davey Farms Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $46,319 |
27 | Page Baldwin Livestock | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $45,225 |
28 | Johnson Cofran Furlong | Napa, CA 94558 | $43,627 |
29 | Balestra & Balestra | Fairfield, CA 94533 | $41,608 |
30 | Tam Tran | Vallejo, CA 94591 | $40,240 |
31 | Erik Alan Freese Dba Freese Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $39,455 |
32 | D3 Enterprises LLC | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $38,508 |
33 | Michael Hendrix | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $36,659 |
34 | Enzo Guidi Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $36,099 |
35 | Lewelling Vineyards | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $35,417 |
36 | Nathanael James Graham Miller | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $34,209 |
37 | S & S Farming Co | Dixon, CA 95620 | $33,674 |
38 | Ross Rasmussen | Dixon, CA 95620 | $32,591 |
39 | Triad Farms | Davis, CA 95617 | $32,088 |
40 | Ahart Livestock Inc | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $31,353 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”