Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 134
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Solano County, California totaled $2,283,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Enzo Guidi Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $14,929 |
42 | Bolin Farming Co LLC | Alamo, CA 94507 | $13,864 |
43 | T Ray Farms Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $13,723 |
44 | Gary Esperson | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $13,525 |
45 | Kimberly Esperson | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $13,525 |
46 | Mortimore L Triplett | Dixon, CA 95620 | $12,795 |
47 | Lorin F Warren | Dixon, CA 95620 | $12,556 |
48 | Dolores D Ramos Tr Dtd Nov 8 1994 | Dixon, CA 95620 | $11,218 |
49 | Joe Castro | Winters, CA 95694 | $10,708 |
50 | James E Tenbrink | Winters, CA 95694 | $10,464 |
51 | Colleen Tenbrink | Winters, CA 95694 | $10,464 |
52 | Sylvia C Darrough | Davis, CA 95617 | $9,692 |
53 | Michael Martin | Winters, CA 95694 | $8,655 |
54 | Richard-atherton Family Tr Dtdfeb | Winters, CA 95694 | $8,614 |
55 | James C Campbell | Dixon, CA 95620 | $8,530 |
56 | William Raycraft | Dixon, CA 95620 | $8,052 |
57 | Carmen Raycraft | Dixon, CA 95620 | $8,052 |
58 | Charles Rogers Family Trust | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $7,884 |
59 | Ronald - Timothy Family Rev Tr Ti | Dixon, CA 95620 | $7,627 |
60 | Istar Dunsmore | Auburn, CA 95602 | $7,361 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”