Market Loss Assistance Program in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 645
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Solano County, California totaled $8,917,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dennis R Murphy | Dixon, CA 95620 | $70,929 |
42 | Maren Murphy | Dixon, CA 95620 | $70,929 |
43 | Albert Carrington | Vacaville, CA 95687 | $69,413 |
44 | Hamilton-hechtman Joint Venture | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $67,780 |
45 | Monk & Son | Dixon, CA 95620 | $66,683 |
46 | Craig Gnos Dba Batavia Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $63,830 |
47 | Gill Land & Farming | Dixon, CA 95620 | $63,662 |
48 | Yolo Land & Cattle Co | Woodland, CA 95695 | $63,173 |
49 | Jean Pedersen | Marysville, CA 95901 | $62,625 |
50 | James C Campbell | Dixon, CA 95620 | $59,017 |
51 | Michael P Glide | Dixon, CA 95620 | $58,694 |
52 | Sally Glide | Dixon, CA 95620 | $58,686 |
53 | Olagaray Brothers | Lodi, CA 95242 | $52,372 |
54 | Cronin Trust | Hayward, CA 94552 | $51,883 |
55 | Mccormack Sheep & Grain | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $51,167 |
56 | Mark Holdener Ranch | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $49,458 |
57 | George W Anderson | Dixon, CA 95620 | $49,307 |
58 | Duncan Mccormack III Trust | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $47,619 |
59 | Sylvia C Darrough | Davis, CA 95617 | $47,588 |
60 | Nishi Farms Inc | Davis, CA 95618 | $47,334 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”