Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Solano County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 82
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Solano County, California totaled $1,016,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | K Barsoom Ranch | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $2,814 |
42 | Gary Esperson | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $2,741 |
43 | Kimberly Esperson | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $2,741 |
44 | Dan Hagan | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $2,730 |
45 | Ross Rasmussen | Dixon, CA 95620 | $2,210 |
46 | Currey Farming Joint Venture | Dixon, CA 95620 | $2,200 |
47 | J F & R W Dittmer | Fairfield, CA 94534 | $2,176 |
48 | Bulkley Ranch | Dixon, CA 95620 | $2,134 |
49 | Gordon R Rasmussen | Pleasanton, CA 94588 | $1,628 |
50 | Carol Chastain Trust Utd 03/27/2007 | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,605 |
51 | Antonio Passaglia | Stockton, CA 95219 | $1,563 |
52 | Holdener Farms Inc | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $1,414 |
53 | Celeste Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $1,393 |
54 | Edward L Fry | Vacaville, CA 95696 | $1,093 |
55 | William H Jones Jr | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,020 |
56 | Nakahara Familytrust C | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $910 |
57 | Barbara Michalowski | Covington, KY 41017 | $876 |
58 | Manuel Gamio | Dixon, CA 95620 | $835 |
59 | Paul And Jeralyn K Favero Revocable Trust | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $694 |
60 | Craig Gnos Dba Batavia Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $605 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”