Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 87
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Solano County, California totaled $201,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sydney R & Diane S Schroeder Rev Tr | Dixon, CA 95620 | $147 |
62 | Marv Van Curen | Davis, CA 95618 | $147 |
63 | Ivanna S Dietrich | San Francisco, CA 94104 | $137 |
64 | Miles Farms | Seattle, WA 98115 | $132 |
65 | Sarah A Walser | Dixon, CA 95620 | $131 |
66 | Margaret Joslin | San Marcos, CA 92078 | $123 |
67 | William Joslin Bypass Trust | San Marcos, CA 92078 | $123 |
68 | G A Smith Trust C Fbo D & L Dezar | Dixon, CA 95620 | $121 |
69 | G A Smith Trust D Fbo J & J Morri | Dixon, CA 95620 | $121 |
70 | Schroeder Enterprise | Dixon, CA 95620 | $121 |
71 | Craig Nakahara | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $117 |
72 | Norma Erline Goodman | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $106 |
73 | Robert Michael Avilla | Portola Valley, CA 94028 | $106 |
74 | Gordon Lynn Avilla | Woodland, CA 95695 | $106 |
75 | Uc Regents | Davis, CA 95616 | $82 |
76 | David A Hamel | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $71 |
77 | Ted Gansberger | Winters, CA 95694 | $59 |
78 | Howard R Galbreath | Winters, CA 95694 | $59 |
79 | Barbara A Butler Fam Tr Fbo-warre | Carmel, CA 93922 | $57 |
80 | Barbara A Butler Fam Tr Fbo-derek | Hollister, CA 95023 | $57 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”