Loan Deficiency in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 437
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Solano County, California totaled $5,199,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bulkley Ranch | Dixon, CA 95620 | $19,244 |
62 | David Celli | Stockton, CA 95215 | $19,122 |
63 | Jean Pedersen | Marysville, CA 95901 | $18,916 |
64 | Eric C Warnken | Dixon, CA 95620 | $17,983 |
65 | S R Schroeder Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $15,552 |
66 | Mitch Etcheverria | Dixon, CA 95620 | $15,340 |
67 | Duncan Mccormack III Trust | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $15,042 |
68 | Mark Holdener Ranch | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $14,978 |
69 | H H & J Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $14,757 |
70 | Napa Valley Lamb Company | Loveland, CO 80537 | $14,626 |
71 | Woody Brothers Inc | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $14,506 |
72 | Fred Barry | Dixon, CA 95620 | $13,607 |
73 | William R Hale | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $13,399 |
74 | Thomas F Galindo | Dixon, CA 95620 | $13,162 |
75 | Cronin Trust | Hayward, CA 94552 | $12,882 |
76 | Kidwell Farms | Davis, CA 95617 | $12,502 |
77 | K Barsoom Ranch | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $12,403 |
78 | Gary Esperson | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $11,769 |
79 | Dexter Mayhood | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $11,754 |
80 | Carlo Guidi | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $11,749 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”