Loan Deficiency in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 437
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Solano County, California totaled $5,199,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Claire Lea | Columbia, MD 21044 | $6,272 |
102 | Riedel Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $5,840 |
103 | Lum Brothers | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $5,730 |
104 | Moss & Mace | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $5,594 |
105 | Arjan Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $5,528 |
106 | Anderson Brothers | San Francisco, CA 94118 | $5,469 |
107 | D W Properties | Dixon, CA 95620 | $5,409 |
108 | Perry Anderson Co | Cambria, CA 93428 | $5,354 |
109 | Grace Stewart-vargas 1993 Trust | Pine Grove, CA 95665 | $5,323 |
110 | Joe F Anderson | Dixon, CA 95620 | $5,223 |
111 | D3 Enterprises LLC | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $5,126 |
112 | William C Petersen | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $5,043 |
113 | David B Comber | Welches, OR 97067 | $4,889 |
114 | The Mark Atkinson Revoc Tr Dba At | Dixon, CA 95620 | $4,799 |
115 | Loretta Fletcher | Dixon, CA 95620 | $4,681 |
116 | Warren Sievers | Dixon, CA 95620 | $4,613 |
117 | Marge E Winters | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $4,531 |
118 | Robert S Currey Trust | Dixon, CA 95620 | $4,175 |
119 | Christy Freese | Davis, CA 95618 | $4,136 |
120 | Erik Freese | Davis, CA 95616 | $4,136 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”