Market Loss Assistance Program in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 645
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Solano County, California totaled $8,917,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | C K Snyder | Winters, CA 95694 | $9,806 |
142 | Ethel B Sawtelle | Vacaville, CA 95687 | $9,279 |
143 | D W Properties | Dixon, CA 95620 | $8,896 |
144 | Foxco | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $8,820 |
145 | Moss & Mace | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $8,760 |
146 | John R Morrill | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $8,692 |
147 | R & J Farms | Vacaville, CA 95687 | $8,544 |
148 | John J Vanetti Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $8,437 |
149 | Joseph Passaglia Trust | Fresno, CA 93720 | $8,318 |
150 | Pitto Bros | Daly City, CA 94014 | $8,305 |
151 | Eddie S Nakahara | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $8,251 |
152 | Janet Parker | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $8,229 |
153 | Anderson Brothers | San Francisco, CA 94118 | $7,986 |
154 | Bertolero Inc | El Macero, CA 95618 | $7,941 |
155 | Edward L Fry | Vacaville, CA 95696 | $7,900 |
156 | Carol Chastain | Dixon, CA 95620 | $7,813 |
157 | Janet Wiegand | Cottonwood, AZ 86326 | $7,809 |
158 | Doniphan H Hanes | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $7,796 |
159 | Daniel Martinez | Winters, CA 95694 | $7,748 |
160 | Frates Property | Newport Beach, CA 92660 | $7,663 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”