Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 240
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Solano County, California totaled $13,261,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Brook Rosenberger | Fairfield, CA 94533 | $5,882 |
162 | Michael Rosenberger | Fairfield, CA 94533 | $5,882 |
163 | Daniel Carey | Winters, CA 95694 | $5,521 |
164 | John Cronin | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $5,335 |
165 | Joe Castro | Winters, CA 95694 | $5,317 |
166 | Hyer Revoc Living Trust | Winters, CA 95694 | $5,302 |
167 | Joetta Griffin | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $4,907 |
168 | Richard Sellers | Winters, CA 95694 | $4,774 |
169 | Barbara Cox | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $4,730 |
170 | David Frye | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $4,730 |
171 | Bobbie Wellman | Sonora, CA 95370 | $4,730 |
172 | Bennett D Lyons | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $4,615 |
173 | Mohan Johal | Fairfield, CA 94534 | $4,440 |
174 | J I & G E Lopez Trust | Winters, CA 95694 | $4,287 |
175 | William C Petersen | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $4,285 |
176 | Cecilia Aguilar-rodriguez | Vacaville, CA 95687 | $4,253 |
177 | David Scheiber | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $4,242 |
178 | Hutson Brazelton | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $4,180 |
179 | Bill Traylor | Winters, CA 95694 | $4,070 |
180 | Narinder Judge | Dublin, CA 94568 | $4,016 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”