Farm Subsidy information
Solano County, California
Total Subsidies in Solano County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 179
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Solano County, California totaled $3,539,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ian & Margaret Anderson Dba E A Anderson & Son | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $118,731 |
2 | Detar Livestock Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $67,569 |
3 | Knob Hill Mines Inc | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $63,048 |
4 | Gene Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $62,380 |
5 | Elizabeth R Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $62,376 |
6 | Atkinson Farms II Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $57,748 |
7 | E & H Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $55,909 |
8 | Nakahara Farms Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $54,435 |
9 | Mark Esperson | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $53,892 |
10 | R Emigh Livestock | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $53,827 |
11 | Denny E Kidwell | Davis, CA 95617 | $52,635 |
12 | Stanley Lester | Winters, CA 95694 | $51,888 |
13 | Gli-co Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $47,874 |
14 | Robert Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $47,422 |
15 | Holdener Farms Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $46,905 |
16 | Hd Ranch | Dixon, CA 95620 | $42,786 |
17 | Hamilton Brothers | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $42,370 |
18 | Fred Ramos Dba Ramos Orchards | Winters, CA 95694 | $39,092 |
19 | Dustin Timothy | Woodland, CA 95695 | $38,849 |
20 | S & S Farming Co | Dixon, CA 95620 | $36,055 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>