Farm Subsidy information
Solano County, California
Total Subsidies in Solano County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 207
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Solano County, California totaled $7,958,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Sierra Orchards Lp | Winters, CA 95694 | $67,099 |
| 22 | Bolin Farming Co LLC | Alamo, CA 94507 | $64,077 |
| 23 | Jamieson Canyon Ranch | American Canyon, CA 94503 | $62,029 |
| 24 | Willow Ranch Properties | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $61,987 |
| 25 | Knob Hill Mines Inc | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $61,961 |
| 26 | Carlo Guidi | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $61,825 |
| 27 | D3 Enterprises LLC | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $57,369 |
| 28 | Matthew B Jones Jr | Dixon, CA 95620 | $56,817 |
| 29 | Gli-co Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $56,021 |
| 30 | Tolenas Springs Cattle Company | Dixon, CA 95620 | $55,877 |
| 31 | Neil A Anderson | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $54,490 |
| 32 | Page Baldwin Livestock | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $53,279 |
| 33 | Elizabeth R Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $51,841 |
| 34 | Gene Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $51,831 |
| 35 | Hearn Livestock General Partnership | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $51,092 |
| 36 | Rod Mcgrew | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $50,333 |
| 37 | Davey Farms Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $46,319 |
| 38 | Martin Emigh | Dixon, CA 95620 | $43,655 |
| 39 | Johnson Cofran Furlong | Napa, CA 94558 | $43,627 |
| 40 | Ahart Livestock Inc | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $42,490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf