Farm Subsidy information
Solano County, California
Total Subsidies in Solano County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,643
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Solano County, California totaled $163,695,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Craig Gnos Dba Batavia Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $723,477 |
42 | Ronald Timothy | Dixon, CA 95620 | $718,120 |
43 | Woody Brothers Inc | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $717,103 |
44 | Freese Ranch | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $708,828 |
45 | Davey Farms Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $707,210 |
46 | , | $685,516 | |
47 | Rancho Rio Vista | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $679,868 |
48 | Park Avenue Turf Inc | Sebastopol, CA 95473 | $656,472 |
49 | Ulysses Mendoza | Dixon, CA 95620 | $637,897 |
50 | James C Campbell | Dixon, CA 95620 | $633,260 |
51 | Mccormack Sheep & Grain | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $622,319 |
52 | T Ray Farms Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $616,004 |
53 | Hearn Livestock General Partnership | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $592,444 |
54 | Jamieson Canyon Ranch | American Canyon, CA 94503 | $582,200 |
55 | D3 Enterprises LLC | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $581,277 |
56 | Timothy Wellman | Birds Lndg, CA 94585 | $571,787 |
57 | Page Baldwin Livestock | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $560,803 |
58 | Dustin Timothy | Woodland, CA 95695 | $557,111 |
59 | Jones Bros Ptnrshp | Dixon, CA 95620 | $536,532 |
60 | Holdener Farms Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $523,481 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”