Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Solano County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 172
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Solano County, California totaled $1,650,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | George Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $22,062 |
22 | James J Coelho | Fremont, CA 94539 | $21,547 |
23 | Pacific Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95617 | $19,770 |
24 | Rod Mcgrew | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $19,120 |
25 | Julia Carrington | Vacaville, CA 95687 | $18,927 |
26 | Gordon R Rasmussen | Pleasanton, CA 94588 | $18,264 |
27 | Ross Rasmussen | Dixon, CA 95620 | $16,477 |
28 | Pitto Brothers Cattle Company | Dixon, CA 95620 | $16,443 |
29 | Detar 2005 Family Trust | Dixon, CA 95620 | $16,268 |
30 | Patricia Detar | Dixon, CA 95620 | $16,268 |
31 | William C Petersen | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $16,031 |
32 | Ecosystem Concepts Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $15,633 |
33 | J F & R W Dittmer | Fairfield, CA 94534 | $15,245 |
34 | Jean P Irissarry | Dixon, CA 95620 | $13,932 |
35 | Wes Stewart | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $12,918 |
36 | Tule Vista Livestock | Suisun City, CA 94585 | $12,800 |
37 | Page Baldwin | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $12,448 |
38 | R Emigh Livestock | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $12,389 |
39 | Five Dot Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $12,160 |
40 | Page Baldwin Jr | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $12,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”