Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sonoma County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 111
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $8,287,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | E & M Deniz Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $137,659 |
22 | Aggio Dairy Inc | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $136,739 |
23 | Circle Lc Corp | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $136,717 |
24 | Joseph Camozzi Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $129,310 |
25 | Jlt Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $126,098 |
26 | Roy King Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $123,699 |
27 | James Cunningham Dba Cunningham Dairy | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $111,643 |
28 | John A Mattos Jr | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $98,863 |
29 | Beretta Dairy | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $97,850 |
30 | Ielmorini Moody Dairy | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $96,917 |
31 | Mazzetta Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $96,150 |
32 | Henry Perucchi & Son | Bodega, CA 94922 | $94,793 |
33 | Jack Dei Jr | Sebastopol, CA 95473 | $92,319 |
34 | Robert Mcclelland Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $89,539 |
35 | Jessica Silacci Dba Jessbe Farm | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $77,427 |
36 | Nick Mattos | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $75,866 |
37 | Michael Mello | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $71,293 |
38 | Nosecchi Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $69,699 |
39 | Cheryl Lafranchi | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $69,527 |
40 | Albert Mello Jr | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $66,850 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”