Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Sonoma County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 49
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $351,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Margaret S Yarak | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $4,562 |
22 | Cheryl Lafranchi | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $4,496 |
23 | Lark And Leaf LLC | Sebastopol, CA 95473 | $4,470 |
24 | Quetzal Farm LLC Dba Blue Leg Farms | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $3,178 |
25 | Celeste Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $3,135 |
26 | Polesky-lentz Partnership | Healdsburg, CA 95448 | $2,862 |
27 | Michael Mansfield | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $2,795 |
28 | Kelly Osman - Oz Family Farm | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $2,392 |
29 | Linked Vineyards | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $2,238 |
30 | O'connell Vineyards | Sebastopol, CA 95473 | $2,035 |
31 | Dee A Rued | Healdsburg, CA 95448 | $1,682 |
32 | The Pinot Elite LLC | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $1,641 |
33 | Plescia And Brady Dba Green Valley Community Farm | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $1,587 |
34 | Bazzano Azienda LLC | Concord, CA 94521 | $1,452 |
35 | Montrose Vineyards LLC | Cloverdale, CA 95425 | $1,151 |
36 | , | $1,024 | |
37 | Small Vines Wines, Inc. | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $981 |
38 | Bea Charles | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $957 |
39 | Klt Vineyards LLC | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $664 |
40 | Jennifer R Trotter | Graton, CA 95444 | $643 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”