Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Sonoma County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 235
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $6,556,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ralph Bastian Jr | Callender, IA 50523 | $85,176 |
22 | James M Tremari | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $84,581 |
23 | Dolcini Bros | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $83,237 |
24 | W Terry Lindley | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $83,190 |
25 | Henry Perucchi & Son | Bodega, CA 94922 | $81,364 |
26 | Doniga Markegard | Half Moon Bay, CA 94019 | $80,322 |
27 | Mcclellands Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $76,881 |
28 | H & L Mohring And Sons LLC | Pinole, CA 94564 | $76,461 |
29 | Tom Crane | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $75,918 |
30 | Moreda Valley Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $69,658 |
31 | Frederick Radtkey | Hoquiam, WA 98550 | $67,209 |
32 | Paul Bianchi Inc | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $62,652 |
33 | Celeste Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $62,021 |
34 | Spaletta Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $60,834 |
35 | Garry S Mahrt | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $57,532 |
36 | Moreda Donald J | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $57,387 |
37 | Steve P Bianchi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $55,379 |
38 | Bell Cattle Company | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $51,404 |
39 | Sonoma Mountain Herefords Inc | Petaluma, CA 94953 | $49,872 |
40 | Larry Peter | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $46,353 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”