Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Sonoma County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $136,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeff Jones | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $1,865 |
22 | Spaletta Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,767 |
23 | Steve P Bianchi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $1,681 |
24 | Garry S Mahrt | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,631 |
25 | M/c Furlong Ranches | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $1,590 |
26 | Kevin Furlong | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $1,452 |
27 | Jessica Silacci Dba Jessbe Farm | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $1,438 |
28 | Larry Peter | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,419 |
29 | Nosecchi Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,375 |
30 | Celeste Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $1,332 |
31 | Joe Pozzi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $1,242 |
32 | Alexander Balli | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,225 |
33 | Martin Witt Jr. | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,222 |
34 | Francis Chris Cornett | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,173 |
35 | Travis Moreda | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,090 |
36 | Robert Camozzi II | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,081 |
37 | Paul Bianchi Inc | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $1,014 |
38 | L Corda & Sons | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,011 |
39 | Domenico Carinalli Jr | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $926 |
40 | Paul Mitterbach | Cloverdale, CA 95425 | $704 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”