Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Sonoma County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 79
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $662,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gilardi & Jacobsen Ag Service, Inc | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $5,122 |
42 | Martin Witt Jr. | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $4,800 |
43 | Mce Amos Inc | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $4,347 |
44 | Steve Riebli Ranch LLC | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $4,088 |
45 | Frank Gambonini Dba Gamlake Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $4,028 |
46 | Paul Bianchi Inc | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $3,984 |
47 | Achadinha Cheese Company Inc. | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,796 |
48 | Jessica Silacci Dba Jessbe Farm | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $3,466 |
49 | Larry Peter | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,423 |
50 | Gayleen Vieira-maas | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,334 |
51 | Bell Cattle Company | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $3,312 |
52 | George Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $3,211 |
53 | Mazzetta Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,187 |
54 | Petaluma Pumpkin Patch LLC | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $2,957 |
55 | Alexander Balli | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $2,951 |
56 | Joe Pinheiro | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $2,878 |
57 | Francis Chris Cornett | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $2,823 |
58 | Paul Mitterbach | Cloverdale, CA 95425 | $2,768 |
59 | James Tunzi | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $2,642 |
60 | Robert Camozzi II | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $2,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”