Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Sonoma County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 134
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $5,039,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Renati Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $23,658 |
42 | Kelly Ryan Barnett | Bodega, CA 94922 | $22,468 |
43 | Dolcini Bros | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $22,008 |
44 | Clement Edward Vanoni | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $21,778 |
45 | John F Hildebrand | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $21,525 |
46 | Morrison Bros Dairy | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $21,172 |
47 | Fred Radelfinger | Windsor, CA 95492 | $20,567 |
48 | Henry Perucchi & Son | Bodega, CA 94922 | $19,954 |
49 | Celeste Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $18,983 |
50 | James M Tremari | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $18,348 |
51 | Tom Crane | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $17,884 |
52 | Weeks Ranch | Santa Rosa, CA 95409 | $17,114 |
53 | Michael Furlong Sr | Jenner, CA 95450 | $16,093 |
54 | Terrilinda Farms | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $13,988 |
55 | Robert Camozzi II | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $12,816 |
56 | Bell Cattle Company | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $12,104 |
57 | Steve P Bianchi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $12,033 |
58 | Kenneth A Wilson-kenneth A Wilson And Clairette W | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $11,865 |
59 | Roy King Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $11,468 |
60 | D/b Ranch | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $11,351 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”