Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Sonoma County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 117
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $1,687,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Kenneth A Wilson-kenneth A Wilson And Clairette W | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $5,010 |
| 42 | Weeks Ranch | Santa Rosa, CA 95409 | $4,991 |
| 43 | Henry Perucchi & Son | Bodega, CA 94922 | $4,892 |
| 44 | Ronald E Wilson Dba Diamond W Dairy Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $4,788 |
| 45 | Robert Arndt | Inverness, CA 94937 | $4,752 |
| 46 | Ralph Bastian Jr | Callender, IA 50523 | $4,701 |
| 47 | Bell Cattle Company | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $4,484 |
| 48 | Colleen Briggs | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $4,418 |
| 49 | Roy King Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $4,205 |
| 50 | Nick Bursio | Penngrove, CA 94951 | $4,141 |
| 51 | Celeste Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $3,974 |
| 52 | Clement Edward Vanoni | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $3,943 |
| 53 | Ron Harston | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $3,892 |
| 54 | Todd Horrick | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,831 |
| 55 | Terrilinda Farms | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $3,586 |
| 56 | W Terry Lindley | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $3,360 |
| 57 | D/b Ranch | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $3,312 |
| 58 | Alexander Balli | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,190 |
| 59 | , | $3,127 | |
| 60 | Steve P Bianchi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $3,039 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
